#ETH突破3600# stablecoin? In the past, when the national teams were not participating in the market, we often heard the saying that there were hidden dangers of USDT collapsing. Now, when everyone is playing with stablecoins, it seems as if the issue of stablecoin depegging does not exist. What logic is this?

1:1
You give me 1 USD, I give you 1 USDT
I deposited USDT into a third party #辣妹儿李嘉欣# . Of course, the third party seems to have no issues on the surface, but problems always exist ( or they might take your money to buy US dollar bonds.
What convenience can exchanging stablecoins bring you? Low transaction fees ) but the fees are artificially set, currently low, competing for users like the e-commerce war for payment entry various discounts (, convenient transactions ) it is indeed convenient when trading, direct payments, but has anyone noticed that before international trade transactions, that is, long ago when you and I exchanged 1:1, this step was not less, or in the internet age where electronic products can be tapped to pay directly conveniently? (, low volatility ) the basis of high and low volatility is built on the anchored assets, anchored to gold, anchored to the US dollar, I won't comment on the volatility of gold, but regarding the anchored US dollar, you ask whether the US dollar is volatile or not! If it is volatile, then stablecoin volatility will be high, if not, then why use this advantage to reflect the benefits of stablecoins (.
So the countries, institutions, and companies participating in stablecoins are looking to expand the global market unification. It's somewhat similar to the early payment era of Tencent and Alibaba, where they were competing for this entry point. However, once the entry point is opened, these stablecoins are not directly interoperable and cannot be traded with each other. Do you understand what I mean? Basically, it means that the money in your Tencent wallet cannot interact with Alibaba's system, and your transaction will fail. Stablecoins are built on public chains, private chains, and cross-chains, with users on each chain. If they do business with each other, this is similar to how you conduct trade with USD and EUR. In international trade, indeed both USD and EUR are accepted. In the future, merchants will accept stablecoins on the Ethereum chain, stablecoins on Sol, and even stablecoins on the Atom chain. What difference does that make compared to traditional trade transactions?
The common people don't understand, you say the sheep's head doesn't look good, so you use a dog's head instead, but the blood spilled on the ground is always red, and it will never be blue, hmm~? Blue? Why does this sound familiar?